Skip to main content
Enter your keywords
View the results at Google
, or enable JavaScript to view them here.
Peer-Review Report - online instrument
Article title
Referent (Name and academic title)
Institutional affiliation of the referent
E-mail
Article submission deadline
Review due date
EVALUATION
I. GENERAL EVALUATION OF THE ARTICLE
A. Write down one of the following answers: yes, no, partially
1. Is this an original contribution in the field of theology?
2. Does the paper reflect current scientific perspectives on the topic?
3. Do the results of the research agree with the argumentative approach?
4. Are the academic norms for writing a scientific paper respected (clarity, coherence, precision, specialized language in the field of theology, etc.)?
5. Are the bibliographic notes correct, complete and in accordance with the topic?
6. Does the title of the study reflect its content?
7. Does the translation follow the rules and conventions at the level of lexicon, grammar, syntax and other dimensions characteristic of religious texts?
8. Does the review meet the critical aspect of the study?
B. Write down one of the following grades: excellent, good, acceptable, low, very low.
1. Clarity of the summary
2. Degree of novelty
3. Relevance of the conclusions
4. Value of results
II. EVALUATOR'S RECOMMENDATION
ACCEPT AS IS
ACCEPT AS IS OR WITH ONLY MINOR REVISIONS
ACCEPT CONDITIONALLY, UPON COMPLETION OF SPECIFIED REVISIONS
INVITE RESUBMISSION, AFTER EXTENSIVE REVISIONS
REJECT (specifying the reasons)
Reasons
Detailed comments or observations on the content
CAPTCHA
Math question
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.